I won't demonize language, even though I could; it's just that it's not that constructive.  So I'll use language putting it this way: if you can think beyond language (more on 'beyond' below), you might go far, and 'far' means things you wouldn't imagine but they're not all the pies in the sky you imagine.  'there is more in heaven and earth, horatio, than is dreamt of..' but sometimes, and that means just sometimes, the fruits aren't always in flashy things in front of you but the mind.  no, the mind is not separate.... and that's a nebulism that's but one key to what i'm talking about.

anyway, the thing i was telling you is that 'beyond' doesn't necessarily mean some made-up Hyperion which is fun too, but they tend to be rather #hyper-real and that ignores #romance and/or #compassion.

in another word, 'beyond' can simply mean 'below.'

now, if that's too hard, which it is for most people, you can simply play with words until they appear just as they are: like toys.

the thing is that words often have referents which are, let's say #significant, and that means you '''could''' become #disoriented.
---
#just-in-case it helps, and this is 'almost' an alternate 'theory' or 'line-of-discussion', it might help to learn poetry, or poetic speaking.

the trick to this is that, there's more than one way to say things: passion will bring you to the way that 'rhymes' or rhymes.

now, in #my-experience, it's not only which way to say things but there's another level: what you mean to say exactly, which is pretty closely tied to whom you are probably.

is it betrayal, betrayal of yourself that is, to change or pick-and-choose who you are for the story of a poem to rhyme?  not always or not necessarily.  (why the hell does rey think that "not necessarily" means "necessarily not?" anyway.. it's because he's such a poet.)  "not necessarily" because you can rain, from diamonds.
furthermore because we #are more than we #think, and time is bendable just because there's so much of it and an entire timeline of infinity is in you.

-----

"not necessarily" doesn't mean "necessarily not" because in English grammar qualifiers go before the qualified (you don't say, "rose red" (or you might, if you meant, red that's roseish in nature (i never did figure out if multiple levels of parentheses are valid english, now that we're talking about grammar-structures..))), and 'necessarily not' means it's 'not', but necessarily, and of course 'not necessarily' is like, necessarily, only the opposite, which means that necessarily isn't there. necessarily means that it can't be the other way around, so 'necessarily isn't there' means that it can be, which is a different thing from saying 'it has to be a not.' duh. actually i only take the long way around to explain it because i can't understand how #somebody couldn't have understood that already.. :P

---

i could have said most of this about the limitation of words & language in a Visio graph, and i pirated it just for that purpose, but i got lazy and decided to use words because I've already been good with word.

-------------

#Terralever